|
|
Good rings, such because the Oura ring, might need potential in health monitoring. To have the ability to identify optimal units for healthcare settings, validity studies are wanted. The goal of this study was to compare the Oura smart ring estimates of steps and sedentary time with data from the ActiGraph accelerometer in a free-living context. A cross-sectional observational study design was used. 42) participated in the study and wore an Oura smart ring and an ActiGraph accelerometer on the non-dominant hand constantly for 1 week. The participants accomplished a background questionnaire and filled out a day by day log about their sleeping instances and instances when they didn't wear the gadgets. 42) was 32 years (range, 18-forty six years). In complete, 191 (61% of the potential) days were compared. The Oura ring overestimated the step counts in contrast with the ActiGraph. The imply distinction was 1416 steps (95% confidence interval, 739-2093 steps). Day by day sedentary time was also overestimated by the ring; the mean distinction was 17 minutes (95% confidence interval, -2 to 37 minutes). The usage of the ring in nursing interventions needs to be thought-about.
Also visit my blog :: Herz P1 Insights |
|
發表於